Education Committee
Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee
AN ACT CONCERNING STATE GRANT COMMITMENTS FOR SCHOOL BUILDING PROJECTS, MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTS FOR SURPLUS EDUCATION FUNDS AND REVISIONS TO CERTAIN LIBRARY STATUTES
SUMMARY: This act authorizes $416. 6 million in grant commitments for 29 new local school construction and interdistrict magnet school projects. It also reauthorizes and increases grant commitments for four previously authorized projects with significant changes in cost and scope. Two are being reauthorized for the first time and two for the second. (By law, districts are limited to two reauthorizations. ) The total increase in grant commitments for the reauthorizations is $10. 82 million.
The act authorizes $4. 6 million in additional general obligation bonds to the State Department of Education (SDE) for capital start-up cost grants for new interdistrict magnet schools needed to help the state meet the goals of the 2008 Sheff v. O'Neill school desegregation settlement.
It overrides contrary statutes, special acts, local charters, and ordinances to allow a town board of finance, board of selectmen in a town with no board of finance, or other appropriating authority for a school district to retain and deposit in a nonlapsing account any unspent funds from the town's total budgeted appropriations for education for the prior fiscal year. The amount deposited in the account in any year is limited to 1% of the school district's total budgeted appropriation for that year (§ 32).
The act allows all municipalities to establish and fund public libraries either by action of their legislative bodies or by a petition of at least 50 voters followed by referendum approval. Under prior law, cities could establish libraries only by city council action and towns and boroughs could do so only by a petition and referendum.
Finally, the act waives statutory and regulatory requirements to make specified school construction projects eligible for state grants under certain conditions (“notwithstanding” provisions).
EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage, except for the library provisions, which are effective June 1, 2010, and the provisions concerning bonding for Sheff magnet schools and the municipal nonlapsing account, which are effective July 1, 2010.
§ 1 — SCHOOL PROJECTS
New Authorizations
Table 1 lists the 29 new projects authorized.
Table 1: New School Construction Projects Authorized
District |
School |
Project |
Estimated Cost |
Estimated Grant |
State Reimburse-ment |
Bolton |
Bolton High School |
Extension & alteration/roof replacement |
$25,412,359 |
$13,885,313 |
54. 64% |
Bolton |
Central Administration (BHS) |
Board of education, central administration facility, extension & alteration |
830,141 |
226,795 |
27. 20% |
Capitol Region Education Council (CREC) |
Reggio Magnet School of the Arts |
New construction/ Interdistrict magnet school |
30,069,500 |
28,566,025 |
95. 0% |
CREC |
CREC Medical Profession & Teacher Prep. |
New construction/ Interdistrict magnet school |
52,115,425 |
49,509,654 |
95. 0% |
CREC |
Greater Hartford Public Safety Academy |
New construction/ Interdistrict magnet school |
66,486,125 |
63,161,818 |
95. 0% |
CREC |
International Magnet School for Global Citizenship |
New construction/ Interdistrict magnet school |
26,264,305 |
24,951,090 |
95. 0% |
Clinton |
The Morgan School |
Energy conservation |
630,700 |
274,796 |
43. 57% |
Connecticut Science Center |
Connecticut Science Center |
Alteration/energy conservation/ interdistrict magnet school |
2,930,000 |
2,783,500 |
95. 0% |
East Granby |
R. Dudley Seymour School |
Extension & alteration/roof replacement |
10,307,000 |
4,638,150 |
45. 0% |
East Granby |
Allgrove School |
Alteration/energy conservation |
1,384,524 |
623,036 |
45. 0% |
East Granby |
Central Administration |
Board of education, central administration facility, alteration & energy conservation |
58,482 |
13,158 |
22. 5% |
East Haven |
Joseph Melillo Middle School |
Alteration/energy conservation |
900,000 |
610,740 |
67. 86% |
East Haven |
Momauguin School |
Alteration/energy conservation |
300,000 |
203,580 |
67. 86% |
East Haven |
Deer Run School |
Alteration/energy conservation |
400,000 |
271,440 |
67. 86% |
East Haven |
Overbrook School |
Alteration/energy conservation |
300,000 |
203,580 |
67. 86% |
Fairfield |
Stratfield School |
Extension & alteration |
17,565,000 |
4,515,962 |
25. 71% |
Hartford |
Bellizzi Middle School |
Extension & alteration/roof replacement |
13,000,000 |
10,400,000 |
80. 0% |
Hartford |
M. D. Fox Elementary School |
Alteration/energy conservation |
54,337,500 |
43,470,000 |
80. 0% |
Hartford |
Bulkeley High School |
Alteration |
700,000 |
560,000 |
80. 0% |
Manchester |
Martin School |
Alteration/roof replacement |
532,500 |
346,125 |
65. 0% |
Meriden |
Hanover School |
Extension & alteration |
7,290,700 |
5,624,046 |
77. 14% |
New Fairfield |
Meeting House Hill School |
Extension & alteration/roof replacement |
27,612,208 |
9,763,677 |
35. 36% |
Region 18 |
Lyme-Old Lyme High School |
Extension & alteration/roof replacement |
47,790,000 |
17,065,809 |
35. 71% |
Seymour |
Paul Chatfield School |
Extension & alteration/roof replacement |
32,500,000 |
19,617,000 |
60. 36% |
Stratford |
Honeyspot House (Stratford Academy) |
New construction |
13,850,654 |
7,815,924 |
56. 43% |
Waterford |
Waterford High School |
Extension & alteration |
68,362,787 |
23,680,869 |
34. 64% |
West Haven |
West Haven High School |
Extension & alteration |
109,279,000 |
82,352,654 |
75. 36% |
West Haven |
Central Administration (Main Street) |
Board of education central administration facility/alteration |
3,500,000 |
1,318,000 |
37. 68% |
Winchester |
Pearson Middle School |
Alteration |
250,000 |
175,900 |
70. 36% |
Reauthorized Projects
Table 2 lists the four projects proposed for reauthorization because of significant change in cost or scope.
Table 2: Reauthorization of Previously Authorized Projects
District |
School |
Project |
Previous Grant Authorization |
New Grant Authorization |
Increase | |
FIRST REAUTHORIZATION | ||||||
Montville |
Central Administration |
Board of education central administration facility/alteration |
$137,844 |
$174,480 |
$36,636 | |
Stamford |
Environmental Studies Magnet |
New construction/inter-district magnet school |
55,100,000 |
57,793,215 |
2,693,215 | |
SECOND REAUTHORIZATION | ||||||
Montville |
Montville High School |
Extension/alteration |
14,040,980 |
16,147,168 |
2,106,188 | |
Waterbury |
Duggan School |
Renovation/extension |
24,722,500 |
30,738,413 |
6,015,913 |
§ 2 — SHEFF MAGNET SCHOOL START-UP COSTS
The $4. 6 million in state bond funding for Sheff-related interdistrict magnet schools may be used to purchase buildings or portable classrooms; lease space; and buy equipment, including computers and classroom furniture, for such schools.
§§ 33-35 — PROCEDURE FOR ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC LIBRARY
Under prior law, a city could establish and fund a public library only if the mayor, with the city council's approval, appointed a board of nine library trustees. The trustees were required to adopt bylaws and rules and regulations for, and to operate, the library. The law also gave the trustees control over library funds, requiring them to be spent only on duly authenticated vouchers from the board. Under prior law, the only way for a town or borough to establish a public library was for at least 50 of its voters to petition asking for an annual tax of up to 3 mills to fund a library and for the issue to be approved by a majority of the voters at the next regular municipal election.
The act allows all municipalities to use either of these procedures to establish and fund a public library. It extends to boroughs and towns the requirement that any money collected through a municipal library tax be (1) kept in a library fund separate from other municipal funds and (2) withdrawn only on duly authenticated vouchers from the library trustees.
The act also makes technical and conforming changes.
§§ 3-31 & 36 — WAIVERS FOR CERTAIN SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (“NOTWITHSTANDING” PROVISIONS)
The act waives certain statutory and regulatory requirements to make specified school construction projects eligible for state grants under certain conditions as shown in Table 3. These waivers are referred to as “notwithstanding” provisions.
Table 3: Notwithstanding Provisions for Local School Projects
§ |
District |
School |
Project |
Requirement(s) Waived |
Conditions |
3 |
Bridgeport |
Multi-Magnet High School |
New school |
Begin construction within two years after the General Assembly authorizes a grant commitment for the project |
Begin construction by June 30, 2012 |
4 |
East Haven |
Overbrook Early Learning Center |
Roof replacement |
Timing of bid and plan approval by SDE's Bureau of School Facilities |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
5 |
East Haven |
Momauguin Elementary School |
Roof replacement |
Timing of bid and plan approval by SDE's Bureau of School Facilities |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
6 |
East Haven |
Deer Run Elementary School |
Roof replacement |
Timing of bid and plan approval by SDE's Bureau of School Facilities |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
7 |
East Haven |
Joseph Melillo Middle School |
Roof replacement |
Timing of bid and plan approval by SDE's Bureau of School Facilities |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
8 |
Granby |
Kelly Lane Intermediate School |
Renovation and expansion |
Competitive bidding for orders and contracts |
Applicable to Change Order # 5 and 6 |
9 |
Manchester |
Highland Park School |
Extension and alteration/ roof replacement |
Requirement that description of project type be established at time of application and definition of a renovation project |
Town may change project description to a renovation project and qualify as a renovation |
10 |
New Haven |
Fair Haven Middle School |
Extension and alteration |
Requirement that description of project type be established at time of application and definition of a renovation project |
● Town may change project description to a renovation project and qualify as a renovation ● Education commissioner may not modify standard space specifications for the project |
11 |
New Haven |
Troup Middle School |
Extension and alteration |
Requirement that description of project type be established at time of application and definition of a renovation project |
● Town may change project description to a renovation project and qualify as a renovation ● Education commissioner is barred from modifying standard space specifications for the project ● The increase in the state grant commitment attributable to the change to a renovation project is limited to $5. 8 million |
13 |
Plainville |
Linden Street School |
Expansion and alteration |
Projected enrollment calculation formula and standard space specifications |
● Use 553 as projected enrollment ● Accept at least 24 out-of-district students under the Open Choice interdistrict attendance program starting in the 2011-12 school year ● Meet all other requirements of school construction law and regulations |
14 |
Plainville |
Louis Toffolon School |
Extension and alteration/roof replacement |
Requirement that project scope be established at time of application |
Expand scope to include an installation of a solar panel system |
15 |
Plainville |
Louis Toffolon School |
Extension and alteration/roof replacement |
Competitive bidding for orders and contracts |
● Applicable to the portion of the project for installation of a solar panel system ● Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
16 |
Plainville |
Louis Toffolon School |
Extension and alteration/roof replacement |
Timing of bid and plan approval by SDE's Bureau of School Facilities |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
17 |
Ridgefield |
Ridgefield High School |
Extension and alteration/roof replacement |
Projected enrollment calculation formula and standard space specifications |
● Use 1,798 as projected enrollment ● Meet all other requirements of school construction law and regulations |
18 |
Ridgefield |
Ridgefield High School |
Expansion and alteration/roof replacement |
Square footage limits |
Use 314,317 square feet as maximum square footage |
19 |
Ridgefield |
Ridgefield High School |
Extension and alteration/roof replacement |
Competitive bidding for orders and contracts |
Applicable to the portion of the project for expansion and alteration at Ridgefield High |
20 |
Tolland |
Unspecified |
Purchase of site and new construction project |
Projected enrollment and eligible costs |
● Tolland not responsible for returning any portion of grant already paid prior to the act's passage based on enrollment figure of 1,200 ● SDE not responsible for making any more grant payments based on that figure |
21 |
Waterbury |
Carrington School |
Extension and alteration changed to new construction |
Requirement that projects that have changed in scope be included on annual priority list and submitted to the General Assembly |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
22 |
West Hartford |
Norfeldt Elementary School |
Partial roof replacement |
Timing of bid and plan approval by SDE's Bureau of School Facilities |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
23 |
Windham |
Windham Interdistrict Magnet School |
Off-site connection to sanitary sewer and public water service utilities |
Ineligible costs |
Windham must: ● show that the off-site connection costs less than an on-site well and sewer, and ● ensure that no one other than the school will connect to the off-site connection |
24 |
Region 18 |
Lyme-Old Lyme High School |
Extension and alteration/roof replacement changed to renovation |
Requirement that (1) a description of project type be established at time of application and (2) at least 75% of a building to be renovated be at least 30 years old |
Town may change project description to a renovation project and qualify as a renovation |
25 |
Region 18 |
Lyme-Old Lyme High School |
Extension and alteration/roof replacement changed to renovation |
Requirement that a renovation project to an existing facility cost less that building a new facility |
Town may proceed with renovation project without submitting a cost analysis of the project prepared by an independent licensed architect prior to final plan approval |
26 |
Bethel |
Frank A. Berry Elementary School |
Renovation and expansion |
Projected enrollment calculation formula and standard space specifications |
● Use 597 as projected enrollment ● Meet all other requirements of school construction law and regulations |
27 |
Bethel |
Frank A. Berry Elementary School |
Renovation and expansion |
Square footage limits |
Use 71,640 square feet as maximum square footage for the project |
28 |
Middletown |
Middletown High School |
New school |
Requirement that project scope be established at time of application |
Expand scope to include construction of an emergency access to Cynthia Lane |
29 |
Middletown |
Middletown High School |
New school |
Timing of bid and plan approval by SDE's Bureau of School Facilities |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
30 |
Bristol |
Jennings School |
Roof replacement |
Timing of bid and plan approval by SDE's Bureau of School Facilities |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
31 |
Brookfield |
Center Elementary School |
Asbestos removal |
Timing of bid and plan approval by SDE's Bureau of School Facilities |
Bureau approval of plans and specifications |
36 |
Shelton |
Shelton Intermediate School |
New school |
Statutes and regulations concerning site acquisition costs |
None. The state must reimburse Shelton for site acquisition costs. |
§ 12 — Grant Repayment Exemption for Norwich
By law, a town that takes a public school building project that received a state school construction grant out of service or redirects it to a nonschool use within 20 years after the building received a school construction grant of $2 million or more or 10 years for a smaller grant, must refund the unamortized grant balance to the state. The act exempts Norwich from the requirement to repay unamortized balances totaling up to $250,000 if it redirects one or more schools before June 30, 2010. Norwich must notify SDE by June 30, 2010 which school buildings it will redirect.
BACKGROUND
School Construction Grants
The state reimburses school districts for between 20% and 80% of the eligible costs of local school construction projects. The reimbursement rate depends mostly on town wealth but districts may receive a higher reimbursement for certain types of projects, such as those involving space for school-readiness programs or full-day kindergartens. In addition, certain types of interdistrict projects (vocational agricultural centers, regional special education facilities, and interdistrict magnet schools) are reimbursed at the rate of 95% of eligible costs. Districts also receive a 10-percentage-point bonus for projects undertaken in cooperation with one or more other districts. Board of education central administration facility projects are reimbursed at half the district's otherwise applicable rate. Grants are paid from state general obligation bond funds.
OLR Tracking: JSL: KM: PF: ts